Top discoveries
$COQ
COQINU · Avalanche
0x420fca0121dc28039145009570975747295f2329
Overview
- Decision
- top_discovery
- Opportunity
- 60/100
- Risk
- 12/100
- Survival
- 79/100
- Coverage
- 74%
- Model
- phase1.0
- Cleared the phase-1 discovery bar on stored evidence.
Why this is interesting
- Liquidity is $773,224 (at least $250k). Liquidity is necessary, not evidence of quality.
Why this might be wrong
- Transfers can be paused.
- Cleared the phase-1 discovery bar on stored evidence.
Market data
- Market cap
- $10.73M
- FDV
- $10.73M
- Liquidity
- $773.2K
- 24h volume
- $22.3K
- Pool age
- 1034 days
- 24h price change
- +4%
Price change is displayed and is not an opportunity input. Pool age is the earliest observed pool, not a verified genesis date.
Acceleration
Change against this token's own earlier snapshots. This is not a prediction and not an opportunity score.
Measured 2026-10-26 02:25:36.873114+00:00
Market
unknown
- 15m liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 1h liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 24h liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 3d liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 6h liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 7d liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 15m liquidity_to_mcap · unknown · Not available · stale
- 1h liquidity_to_mcap · unknown · Not available · stale
On-chain
unknown
- 15m active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 1h active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 24h active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 3d active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 6h active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 7d active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 15m buy_count · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 1h buy_count · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
Social
unknown
- Unknown. Not enough earlier snapshots in this domain.
Narrative
declining · coverage 33%
- 6h smart-contract-platform · declining · -2% · complete
- 6h avalanche-ecosystem · unknown · Not available · unavailable
- 6h meme-token · declining · -28% · complete
- 6h avalanche-subnet · unknown · Not available · unavailable
- 6h made-in-usa · unknown · Not available · unavailable
No early acceleration event at this measurement.
Social momentum
Not available. X is queried only for a capped set of in-universe tokens.
Holder concentration
- Raw top-list share
- +41%
- Economic share
- +39%
Economic share is the listed wallets and unlabeled contracts divided by supply that is not labeled as burn, pool, bridge, staking, or exchange. This uses the provider's top-holder list, not a full census. Infrastructure share of total supply is 4%.
Data confidence
- market
- 100%
- onchain
- 100%
- social
- 0%
- development
- 0%
- narrative
- 60%
- risk
- 80%
- overall
- 57%
Data confidence is separate from the opportunity coverage gate.
On-chain
- Recent volume is close to the 24h pace.
- 24h volume changed 38% versus the prior stored snapshot.
- Liquidity changed 4% versus the prior stored snapshot.
- Holder count changed 0% versus the prior stored snapshot.
Smart money
- Signal
- Not available
- Qualified wallets
- 0
- High-confidence wallets
- 0
- Independent entities
- 0
- Independence
- Not available
- Accumulating
- 0
- Historical early-entry quality
- Not available
- Entry range fit
- Not available
- Coordination risk
- Not available
- Data confidence
- Not available
Why smart money matters
8 holder wallets were observed from this run. None have a measured historical track record, so none are qualified. A large balance is not smart money.
Smart money is evidence. It does not clear a honeypot, a malicious contract, extreme concentration, thin liquidity, or unsafe tokenomics.
Historical smart-money evidence: Not available. No free chart has been stored for this token yet.
Wallet tracking
- Tracked since
- 2026-09-27 01:36:58.169578+00:00
- Candidates
- 20
- Emerging
- 0
- Qualified
- 0
- High-confidence
- 0
- Independent entities
- 20
- Coordination risk
- LOW
Tracking starts when a wallet is seen buying a watch, discovery, or strong research token. A candidate is not smart money.
Development
Not available. A missing GitHub link is not treated as proof that nobody is building.
Narrative
- Narrative label FLAT_24H. Median sourced category market-cap change is 0.2% over 24h.
- A single 24h category move is not labeled HIGH and is not a multi-signal narrative score.
- The token name was not used to invent a category.
Tokenomics
- FDV is 1.0x circulating market cap.
- Reported sell tax is 0. This is a provider flag, not an audit.
Risk
Catalysts
- A verifiable reduction of pause or administrative privileges could reduce a key contract risk.
- Sustained increases in volume, holders, and liquidity would provide stronger evidence of organic demand than the current snapshots.
- Independent verification of contract security, liquidity controls, and token distribution could improve the thesis.
- Continued trading activity would extend the observed survival record, though historical survival alone would not establish future durability.
Historical analogues
Not available. Analogues require stored candidates at least 30 days older, with enough overlapping features.
10x / 100x / 1000x market-cap scenarios
- 10x market cap
- $107.29M
- 100x market cap
- $1.07B
- 1000x market cap
- $10.73B
These are arithmetic market-cap scenarios, not predictions and not probabilities.
- No historical sector maximum is stored in the local corpus, so precedent is not available. Absence of a stored precedent is not evidence against the scenario.
- No historical sector maximum is stored in the local corpus, so precedent is not available. Absence of a stored precedent is not evidence against the scenario.
- No historical sector maximum is stored in the local corpus, so precedent is not available. Absence of a stored precedent is not evidence against the scenario.
AI research rationale
COQ on Avalanche is an interesting but highly speculative discovery candidate, not a validated investment thesis. The deterministic opportunity score is 60.2, with reported risk of 12 and survival score of 79.0, but these scores should not override material contract, liquidity-quality, ownership, and momentum uncertainties.
Confidence: medium. The packet contains substantial structured coverage and five of five stated survival inputs, but key investment determinants—including contract-control details, liquidity-lock information, holder concentration, sustained market depth, team information, and smart-money activity—are missing or explicitly limited.
Why it is interesting
The token has approximately $10.7 million market capitalization and FDV, about $773,224 of liquidity, and roughly 1,034 days of observed trading history. A negative honeypot check on the sources that ran and FDV approximately equal to circulating market capitalization are supportive signals. However, the evidence does not establish investment quality, sustainable demand, or the absence of administrative risks.
Bull case
COQ has survived substantial observed trading time, has liquidity above $250,000, and shows no reported circulating-supply-to-FDV gap. The reported sell-tax flag is zero, the honeypot checks that ran were negative, and recent 24-hour volume was up 38% versus the prior stored snapshot. These factors could support continued tradability and speculative interest, though none is conclusive.
Bear case
The token can have transfers paused, and the honeypot result is explicitly not a guarantee. Holder count was flat versus the prior snapshot, liquidity changed only 4%, and the narrative signal was FLAT_24H rather than a strong category trend. Economic holder share is only reported as 39%, smart-money data is unavailable, and the observed age is not a verified genesis date. The evidence does not demonstrate durable demand, decentralization, or liquidity quality.
What would invalidate it
The thesis would be materially weakened by evidence of exploitable pause or privileged controls, failed sellability, disappearing or withdrawable liquidity, concentrated insider selling, sustained deterioration in volume or holders, or inability to verify the token and contract identity. The current evidence is insufficient to determine whether any of these conditions exists.
Missing information
- Unknown / insufficient data on contract ownership, administrator permissions, and whether pause controls are timelocked or renounced.
- Unknown / insufficient data on holder concentration, insider allocations, top-wallet behavior, and treasury balances.
- Unknown / insufficient data on liquidity-lock status, liquidity-provider concentration, and withdrawal permissions.
- Unknown / insufficient data on verified contract source code and independent security audit results.
- Unknown / insufficient data on sustained volume, spreads, slippage, and market depth across venues.
- Unknown / insufficient data on team identity, development activity, roadmap, community quality, and utility.
- Unknown / insufficient data on smart-money activity.
- Unknown / insufficient data on the token's verified genesis date and historical market-cap path.
Model gpt-5.6-luna. The model did not choose the scores.
Backtest context
Forward returns at 7, 30, 90, 180, and 365 days are recorded after those horizons elapse. Until the sample is large enough, no signal is described as predictive.
Source links