Top discoveries
$WPRL
Wrapped Pearl · Ethereum
0x07696dcab55e62cfef953666b29fe1970518cb00
Overview
- Decision
- watch
- Opportunity
- 58/100
- Risk
- 20/100
- Survival
- 76/100
- Coverage
- 83%
- Model
- phase1.0
- Does not clear the discovery bar.
- opportunity 58.4 is below 60
- Enough independent evidence is stored to keep this on the watch list.
Why this is interesting
- Liquidity is $906,890 (at least $250k). Liquidity is necessary, not evidence of quality.
Why this might be wrong
- Contract is a proxy and is not on the provider trust list.
- A majority of LP is unlocked on the provider report.
- Does not clear the discovery bar.
- opportunity 58.4 is below 60
- Enough independent evidence is stored to keep this on the watch list.
Market data
- Market cap
- $7.23M
- FDV
- $7.23M
- Liquidity
- $906.9K
- 24h volume
- $263.4K
- Pool age
- 157 days
- 24h price change
- -4%
Price change is displayed and is not an opportunity input. Pool age is the earliest observed pool, not a verified genesis date.
Acceleration
Change against this token's own earlier snapshots. This is not a prediction and not an opportunity score.
Measured 2026-10-26 04:33:35.840937+00:00
Market
declining · coverage 100%
- 15m liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 1h liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 24h liquidity · declining · -2% · complete
- 3d liquidity · unknown · +42% · complete
- 6h liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 7d liquidity · unknown · +42% · complete
- 15m liquidity_to_mcap · unknown · Not available · stale
- 1h liquidity_to_mcap · unknown · Not available · stale
On-chain
flat · coverage 100%
- 15m active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 1h active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 24h active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 3d active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 6h active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 7d active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 15m buy_count · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 1h buy_count · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
Social
unknown · coverage 100%
- 1h copy_ratio · unknown · Not available · stale
- 24h copy_ratio · unknown · -76% · complete
- 6h copy_ratio · unknown · Not available · stale
- 1h engagement · unknown · Not available · stale
- 24h engagement · unknown · +169% · complete
- 6h engagement · unknown · Not available · stale
- 1h mentions · unknown · Not available · stale
- 24h mentions · unknown · +109% · complete
Narrative
unknown · coverage 0%
- 6h ethereum-ecosystem · unknown · Not available · unavailable
- 6h bridged-tokens · unknown · Not available · unavailable
No early acceleration event at this measurement.
Social momentum
Not available. X is queried only for a capped set of in-universe tokens.
Holder concentration
- Raw top-list share
- +31%
- Economic share
- +26%
Economic share is the listed wallets and unlabeled contracts divided by supply that is not labeled as burn, pool, bridge, staking, or exchange. This uses the provider's top-holder list, not a full census. Infrastructure share of total supply is 7%.
Data confidence
- market
- 100%
- onchain
- 100%
- social
- 0%
- development
- 0%
- narrative
- 0%
- risk
- 80%
- overall
- 47%
Data confidence is separate from the opportunity coverage gate.
On-chain
- Recent volume is below the 24h pace.
- 24h volume changed -44% versus the prior stored snapshot.
- Liquidity changed -2% versus the prior stored snapshot.
- Holder count changed 0% versus the prior stored snapshot.
Smart money
- Signal
- Not available
- Qualified wallets
- 0
- High-confidence wallets
- 0
- Independent entities
- 0
- Independence
- Not available
- Accumulating
- 0
- Historical early-entry quality
- Not available
- Entry range fit
- Not available
- Coordination risk
- Not available
- Data confidence
- Not available
Why smart money matters
6 holder wallets were observed from this run. None have a measured historical track record, so none are qualified. A large balance is not smart money.
Smart money is evidence. It does not clear a honeypot, a malicious contract, extreme concentration, thin liquidity, or unsafe tokenomics.
Historical smart-money evidence: Not available. No free chart has been stored for this token yet.
Wallet tracking
- Tracked since
- 2026-09-27 02:11:05.476089+00:00
- Candidates
- 46
- Emerging
- 0
- Qualified
- 0
- High-confidence
- 0
- Independent entities
- 46
- Coordination risk
- LOW
Tracking starts when a wallet is seen buying a watch, discovery, or strong research token. A candidate is not smart money.
Development
Not available. A missing GitHub link is not treated as proof that nobody is building.
Narrative
Not available. Categories are attached only when a source assigns them.
Tokenomics
- FDV is 1.0x circulating market cap.
- Reported sell tax is 0. This is a provider flag, not an audit.
Risk
- Contract is a proxy and is not on the provider trust list.
- A majority of LP is unlocked on the provider report.
Catalysts
- Independent verification of the proxy implementation, ownership controls, and contract safety.
- A credible LP lock or other evidence that materially reduces liquidity-withdrawal risk.
- Sustained improvement in volume, liquidity quality, and holder growth across multiple snapshots.
- Evidence that social growth is organic, positive, and associated with actual usage or development.
- Clear project disclosures, ongoing development, and verifiable execution against a roadmap.
Historical analogues
Not available. Analogues require stored candidates at least 30 days older, with enough overlapping features.
10x / 100x / 1000x market-cap scenarios
- 10x market cap
- $72.27M
- 100x market cap
- $722.74M
- 1000x market cap
- $7.23B
These are arithmetic market-cap scenarios, not predictions and not probabilities.
- No historical sector maximum is stored in the local corpus, so precedent is not available. Absence of a stored precedent is not evidence against the scenario.
- No historical sector maximum is stored in the local corpus, so precedent is not available. Absence of a stored precedent is not evidence against the scenario.
- No historical sector maximum is stored in the local corpus, so precedent is not available. Absence of a stored precedent is not evidence against the scenario.
AI research rationale
WPRL is a moderately interesting discovery candidate, but the evidence does not support a strong investment thesis. The opportunity score of 61 and survival score of 85 are deterministic heuristics, not proof of quality or future performance. The main positives are meaningful liquidity, an observed trading history of 157.1 days, and increased recent social activity. These are offset by proxy-contract risk, mostly unlocked LP, declining recent volume, and large changes in liquidity and holder count. Further verification is required before treating the token as investable.
Confidence: medium. The packet contains reasonably broad market, liquidity, age, social, and risk indicators, with 70.8% coverage. However, key investability questions remain unresolved, especially proxy controls, LP lock quality, holder concentration, contract safety, project fundamentals, and the reliability of social activity.
Why it is interesting
The token has approximately $7.6 million market capitalization, $921,534 liquidity, and an observed pool age of 157.1 days. FDV is approximately equal to circulating market capitalization, reducing the visible dilution gap. Social activity also increased versus the prior snapshot, although the dataset covers only one recent-search page and does not provide sentiment or full-history context.
Bull case
WPRL may have demonstrated some persistence beyond an initial launch phase, with 157.1 days of observed trading and approximately $921,534 of liquidity. Liquidity is 12.2% of market capitalization, and FDV is 1.0x circulating market capitalization. Recent-search authors and mentions increased substantially versus the prior snapshot, which could indicate expanding attention. The reported sell-tax flag is zero, though this is not an audit.
Bear case
The contract is a proxy and is not on the provider trust list, creating material contract and upgrade-control risk. A majority of LP is unlocked, weakening confidence in liquidity permanence. Recent volume is below the 24-hour pace and was down 12% versus the prior snapshot. Liquidity and holder count changed 44% and 41%, respectively, indicating instability rather than clearly durable growth. Economic holder share is only 26%, and social mention growth lacks sentiment and quality validation.
What would invalidate it
The thesis should be considered invalidated if contract review identifies unsafe upgrade or administrative controls, if liquidity is materially withdrawn or cannot be independently verified, if trading activity proves non-organic or persistently deteriorates, or if holder and social growth fail to persist across subsequent snapshots. The current thesis is also invalidated as an investable claim if the reported market data cannot be independently reconciled.
Missing information
- Verified contract ownership, proxy implementation, upgrade controls, and administrative privileges.
- Independent audit or honeypot, transfer-restriction, and tax verification.
- LP provider, lock terms, unlock schedule, and historical liquidity withdrawals.
- Trading-volume history, exchange or venue composition, and buy/sell transaction quality.
- Holder distribution, insider allocations, wallet concentration, and vesting information.
- Project purpose, development activity, treasury, team disclosures, and roadmap execution.
- Full social history, sentiment, bot-adjusted engagement, and evidence of organic community participation.
- Historical analogue outcomes; no specific analogue evidence is supplied beyond the statement that outcomes are included only when stored later market caps exist.
- Verified genesis date and complete trading history.
Model gpt-5.6-luna. The model did not choose the scores.
Backtest context
Forward returns at 7, 30, 90, 180, and 365 days are recorded after those horizons elapse. Until the sample is large enough, no signal is described as predictive.
Source links