Top discoveries
$EDEL
EDEL · Base
0xfb31f85a8367210b2e4ed2360d2da9dc2d2ccc95
Overview
- Decision
- watch
- Opportunity
- 57/100
- Risk
- 20/100
- Survival
- 79/100
- Coverage
- 71%
- Model
- phase1.0
- Does not clear the discovery bar.
- opportunity 56.9 is below 60
- observed age is over 180 days and no acceleration is stored yet. Age and liquidity alone are not an early signal.
- Enough independent evidence is stored to keep this on the watch list.
Why this is interesting
- Liquidity is $1,071,929 (at least $1M). Liquidity is necessary, not evidence of quality.
Why this might be wrong
- Economic holders control 48%.
- A majority of LP is unlocked on the provider report.
- Does not clear the discovery bar.
- opportunity 56.9 is below 60
- observed age is over 180 days and no acceleration is stored yet. Age and liquidity alone are not an early signal.
- Enough independent evidence is stored to keep this on the watch list.
Market data
- Market cap
- $22.01M
- FDV
- $31.68M
- Liquidity
- $1.07M
- 24h volume
- $150.1K
- Pool age
- 347 days
- 24h price change
- +5%
Price change is displayed and is not an opportunity input. Pool age is the earliest observed pool, not a verified genesis date.
Acceleration
Change against this token's own earlier snapshots. This is not a prediction and not an opportunity score.
Measured 2026-10-26 03:29:28.602236+00:00
Market
flat · coverage 100%
- 15m liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 1h liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 24h liquidity · unknown · -17% · complete
- 3d liquidity · unknown · -17% · complete
- 6h liquidity · flat · +0% · complete
- 7d liquidity · unknown · -17% · complete
- 15m liquidity_to_mcap · unknown · Not available · stale
- 1h liquidity_to_mcap · unknown · Not available · stale
On-chain
declining · coverage 100%
- 15m active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 1h active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 24h active_wallets · unknown · +486% · complete
- 3d active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial
- 6h active_wallets · declining · -92% · complete
- 7d active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial
- 15m buy_count · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 1h buy_count · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
Social
unknown · coverage 100%
- 1h copy_ratio · unknown · Not available · stale
- 24h copy_ratio · unknown · +432% · complete
- 6h copy_ratio · unknown · Not available · stale
- 1h engagement · unknown · Not available · stale
- 24h engagement · unknown · +152% · complete
- 6h engagement · unknown · Not available · stale
- 1h mentions · unknown · Not available · stale
- 24h mentions · unknown · -6% · complete
Narrative
declining · coverage 8%
- 6h binance-smart-chain · declining · -40% · complete
- 6h solana-ecosystem · declining · -66% · complete
- 6h ethereum-ecosystem · unknown · Not available · unavailable
- 6h base-ecosystem · flat · -28% · complete
- 6h base-native · declining · -35% · complete
- 6h robinhood-ecosystem · unknown · Not available · unavailable
No early acceleration event at this measurement.
Social momentum
Score 56/100 · confidence 0.55
- Recent-search page contains 47 posts. This is one page, not the full history.
- Authors on this page are somewhat distributed.
- Unique authors changed 3% versus the prior stored snapshot.
- Mentions changed 0% versus the prior stored snapshot.
- Sentiment is not available. Mention count alone is not treated as community quality.
Holder concentration
- Raw top-list share
- +49%
- Economic share
- +48%
Economic share is the listed wallets and unlabeled contracts divided by supply that is not labeled as burn, pool, bridge, staking, or exchange. This uses the provider's top-holder list, not a full census. Infrastructure share of total supply is 2%.
Data confidence
- market
- 100%
- onchain
- 100%
- social
- 80%
- development
- 0%
- narrative
- 60%
- risk
- 80%
- overall
- 70%
Data confidence is separate from the opportunity coverage gate.
On-chain
- Recent volume is below the 24h pace.
- 24h volume changed -31% versus the prior stored snapshot.
- Liquidity changed 3% versus the prior stored snapshot.
- Holder count changed 0% versus the prior stored snapshot.
Smart money
- Signal
- Not available
- Qualified wallets
- 0
- High-confidence wallets
- 0
- Independent entities
- 0
- Independence
- Not available
- Accumulating
- 0
- Historical early-entry quality
- Not available
- Entry range fit
- Not available
- Coordination risk
- Not available
- Data confidence
- Not available
Why smart money matters
5 holder wallets were observed from this run. None have a measured historical track record, so none are qualified. A large balance is not smart money.
Smart money is evidence. It does not clear a honeypot, a malicious contract, extreme concentration, thin liquidity, or unsafe tokenomics.
Historical smart-money evidence: Not available. No free chart has been stored for this token yet.
Wallet tracking
- Tracked since
- 2026-09-26 23:59:57.339671+00:00
- Candidates
- 354
- Emerging
- 11
- Qualified
- 0
- High-confidence
- 0
- Independent entities
- 363
- Coordination risk
- MEDIUM
Emerging wallet activity detected. 0xcf…9810 0x23…dffc
Emerging wallet activity is not a smart-money alert and does not mean these wallets are qualified.
Tracking starts when a wallet is seen buying a watch, discovery, or strong research token. A candidate is not smart money.
Development
Not available. A missing GitHub link is not treated as proof that nobody is building.
Narrative
- Narrative label FLAT_24H. Median sourced category market-cap change is -0.3% over 24h.
- A single 24h category move is not labeled HIGH and is not a multi-signal narrative score.
- The token name was not used to invent a category.
Tokenomics
- FDV is 1.4x circulating market cap.
- Reported sell tax is 0. This is a provider flag, not an audit.
Risk
- Economic holders control 48%.
- A majority of LP is unlocked on the provider report.
Catalysts
- Sustained liquidity without large withdrawals, particularly given the reported unlocked LP risk.
- A measurable increase in holders and broader wallet participation rather than only short-term volume.
- Recovery or sustained growth in 24-hour volume across multiple snapshots.
- Independent contract, tokenomics, and LP-lock verification.
- Improvement in social activity accompanied by available sentiment and stronger evidence of genuine community engagement.
- A shift from the current flat narrative signal or risk-off regime, if supported by actual demand and activity data.
Historical analogues
Not available. Analogues require stored candidates at least 30 days older, with enough overlapping features.
10x / 100x / 1000x market-cap scenarios
- 10x market cap
- $220.12M
- 100x market cap
- $2.20B
- 1000x market cap
- $22.01B
These are arithmetic market-cap scenarios, not predictions and not probabilities.
- No historical sector maximum is stored in the local corpus, so precedent is not available. Absence of a stored precedent is not evidence against the scenario.
- No historical sector maximum is stored in the local corpus, so precedent is not available. Absence of a stored precedent is not evidence against the scenario.
- No historical sector maximum is stored in the local corpus, so precedent is not available. Absence of a stored precedent is not evidence against the scenario.
AI research rationale
EDEL is a preliminary discovery candidate, not a validated investment thesis. The token has meaningful observed liquidity, nearly one year of observed trading activity, and a negative honeypot check from available sources, but the evidence is weakened by unlocked LP, only 48% economic holder control, declining 24-hour volume, flat social and narrative signals, and a risk-off market regime. The deterministic opportunity score of 61 and survival score of 79 should be treated as screening outputs rather than proof of upside or durability.
Confidence: medium. The packet contains several concrete market-structure observations and full stated survival inputs, but important investment-critical information is absent or explicitly qualified. The evidence supports further diligence as a discovery candidate, not a high-conviction conclusion.
Why it is interesting
EDEL has approximately $1.07 million of liquidity against a $22.0 million market cap, an observed pool age of 347.2 days, and FDV of approximately $31.7 million. Recent hourly volume is above its 24-hour hourly pace, and the reported sell tax is zero. These features justify further diligence, but they do not establish token quality, demand durability, or attractive valuation.
Bull case
The token may have demonstrated some operational persistence, with 347.2 days of observed trading, approximately $1.07 million of liquidity, and a negative honeypot check on the sources that ran. FDV is only 1.4x circulating market cap, and the latest-hour volume was 2.1x the recent 24-hour hourly pace. If liquidity remains stable, holder participation improves, and activity broadens beyond the current limited snapshots, EDEL could merit continued monitoring.
Bear case
The apparent durability is based on the earliest observed pool rather than a verified genesis date. Liquidity is largely unlocked, economic holder control is only 48%, holder count is unchanged, and 24-hour volume is down 23% versus the prior snapshot. Social evidence is limited to one page of 47 posts, mentions are unchanged, sentiment is unavailable, and the narrative signal is flat. The risk-off regime is an additional headwind for microcaps. The reported zero sell tax and negative honeypot result are provider signals, not audits or guarantees.
What would invalidate it
The discovery thesis would be weakened or invalidated by material LP withdrawal, evidence of concentrated or insider-controlled supply, a failed independent contract or trading review, persistent volume contraction, declining liquidity, inability to verify the token's history, or evidence that recent activity is inorganic. A negative honeypot check or zero sell-tax flag should not override contradictory on-chain evidence.
Missing information
- Unknown / insufficient data: contract audit status and detailed contract permissions.
- Unknown / insufficient data: exact LP unlock schedule, provider, and withdrawal history.
- Unknown / insufficient data: holder count, top-holder concentration, wallet clustering, and insider allocations.
- Unknown / insufficient data: verified team identity, treasury holdings, vesting, and token allocation schedule.
- Unknown / insufficient data: revenue, product usage, protocol fundamentals, or other non-speculative demand drivers.
- Unknown / insufficient data: exchange and market-maker coverage.
- Unknown / insufficient data: complete social history, sentiment, bot-adjusted engagement, and community quality.
- Unknown / insufficient data: verified genesis date and complete trading history.
- Unknown / insufficient data: independent confirmation of the reported sell tax and honeypot findings.
Model gpt-5.6-luna. The model did not choose the scores.
Backtest context
Forward returns at 7, 30, 90, 180, and 365 days are recorded after those horizons elapse. Until the sample is large enough, no signal is described as predictive.
Source links