Top discoveries
$CREPE
CREPE · BNB Chain
0xeb2b7d5691878627eff20492ca7c9a71228d931d
Overview
- Decision
- watch
- Opportunity
- 62/100
- Risk
- 18/100
- Survival
- 83/100
- Coverage
- 74%
- Model
- phase1.0
- Does not clear the discovery bar.
- observed age is over 180 days and no acceleration is stored yet. Age and liquidity alone are not an early signal.
- Enough independent evidence is stored to keep this on the watch list.
Why this is interesting
- Liquidity is $642,188 (at least $250k). Liquidity is necessary, not evidence of quality.
Why this might be wrong
- Tax or slippage can be modified.
- External-call flag is set. This is a weak signal by itself.
- Does not clear the discovery bar.
- observed age is over 180 days and no acceleration is stored yet. Age and liquidity alone are not an early signal.
- Enough independent evidence is stored to keep this on the watch list.
Market data
- Market cap
- $6.17M
- FDV
- $5.75M
- Liquidity
- $642.2K
- 24h volume
- $49.1K
- Pool age
- 505 days
- 24h price change
- +4%
Price change is displayed and is not an opportunity input. Pool age is the earliest observed pool, not a verified genesis date.
Acceleration
Change against this token's own earlier snapshots. This is not a prediction and not an opportunity score.
Measured 2026-10-26 05:37:53.023332+00:00
Market
unknown
- 15m liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 1h liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 24h liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 3d liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 6h liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 7d liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 15m liquidity_to_mcap · unknown · Not available · stale
- 1h liquidity_to_mcap · unknown · Not available · stale
On-chain
unknown · coverage 100%
- 15m active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 1h active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 24h active_wallets · unknown · -100% · complete
- 3d active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial
- 6h active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 7d active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial
- 15m buy_count · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 1h buy_count · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
Social
unknown
- Unknown. Not enough earlier snapshots in this domain.
Narrative
flat · coverage 8%
- 6h binance-smart-chain · flat · -4% · complete
- 6h meme-token · flat · +9% · complete
No early acceleration event at this measurement.
Social momentum
Not available. X is queried only for a capped set of in-universe tokens.
Holder concentration
- Raw top-list share
- +22%
- Economic share
- +19%
Economic share is the listed wallets and unlabeled contracts divided by supply that is not labeled as burn, pool, bridge, staking, or exchange. This uses the provider's top-holder list, not a full census. Infrastructure share of total supply is 12%.
Data confidence
- market
- 100%
- onchain
- 100%
- social
- 0%
- development
- 0%
- narrative
- 60%
- risk
- 80%
- overall
- 57%
Data confidence is separate from the opportunity coverage gate.
On-chain
- Recent volume is close to the 24h pace.
- 24h volume changed -38% versus the prior stored snapshot.
- Liquidity changed 0% versus the prior stored snapshot.
- Holder count changed 0% versus the prior stored snapshot.
Smart money
- Signal
- Not available
- Qualified wallets
- 0
- High-confidence wallets
- 0
- Independent entities
- 0
- Independence
- Not available
- Accumulating
- 0
- Historical early-entry quality
- Not available
- Entry range fit
- Not available
- Coordination risk
- Not available
- Data confidence
- Not available
Why smart money matters
6 holder wallets were observed from this run. None have a measured historical track record, so none are qualified. A large balance is not smart money.
Smart money is evidence. It does not clear a honeypot, a malicious contract, extreme concentration, thin liquidity, or unsafe tokenomics.
Historical smart-money evidence: Not available. No free chart has been stored for this token yet.
Wallet tracking
- Tracked since
- 2026-09-27 01:01:57.744519+00:00
- Candidates
- 59
- Emerging
- 1
- Qualified
- 0
- High-confidence
- 0
- Independent entities
- 60
- Coordination risk
- LOW
Tracking starts when a wallet is seen buying a watch, discovery, or strong research token. A candidate is not smart money.
Development
Not available. A missing GitHub link is not treated as proof that nobody is building.
Narrative
- Narrative label FLAT_24H. Median sourced category market-cap change is 4.5% over 24h.
- A single 24h category move is not labeled HIGH and is not a multi-signal narrative score.
- The token name was not used to invent a category.
Tokenomics
- FDV is 0.9x circulating market cap.
- Reported sell tax is 0. This is a provider flag, not an audit.
Risk
- Tax or slippage can be modified.
- External-call flag is set. This is a weak signal by itself.
Catalysts
- Verification that tax and slippage controls are immutable or safely governed.
- Independent confirmation that liquidity is locked or otherwise protected from abrupt withdrawal.
- Sustained volume growth accompanied by increasing holder count and stable or rising liquidity.
- Contract review showing that the external-call flag does not create material control or fund-loss risk.
- Clear evidence of product usage, development activity, or credible ecosystem traction.
- Improved data coverage for holders, trading quality, and historical market behavior.
Historical analogues
Not available. Analogues require stored candidates at least 30 days older, with enough overlapping features.
10x / 100x / 1000x market-cap scenarios
- 10x market cap
- $61.68M
- 100x market cap
- $616.81M
- 1000x market cap
- $6.17B
These are arithmetic market-cap scenarios, not predictions and not probabilities.
- No historical sector maximum is stored in the local corpus, so precedent is not available. Absence of a stored precedent is not evidence against the scenario.
- No historical sector maximum is stored in the local corpus, so precedent is not available. Absence of a stored precedent is not evidence against the scenario.
- No historical sector maximum is stored in the local corpus, so precedent is not available. Absence of a stored precedent is not evidence against the scenario.
AI research rationale
CREPE is an interesting but unproven discovery candidate, not a validated investment thesis. The deterministic opportunity score of 64.4 and survival score of 83.0 are supported by relatively substantial liquidity, observed trading age, and a negative honeypot check, but the evidence also shows declining 24-hour volume, stagnant holder and liquidity snapshots, modifiable tax/slippage settings, and limited fundamental information. The appropriate stance is cautious watchlist rather than conviction.
Confidence: medium. The packet contains reasonably broad screening coverage and consistent headline market-structure data, but several important claims are provider-reported, the contract and liquidity controls are not independently verified, smart-money and fundamental data are unavailable, and the survival metric is explicitly heuristic.
Why it is interesting
CREPE has reported market capitalization of $6.13 million, liquidity of $639,924, and an observed pool age of 505 days. Liquidity is approximately 10.4% of market capitalization, and the FDV is close to circulating market capitalization. These are useful screening characteristics, but they do not establish token quality, sustainable demand, or governance safety.
Bull case
The token has survived for a substantial observed period, with $639,924 of liquidity and a negative honeypot result on the sources that ran. Reported sell tax is zero, the FDV is only 0.9x circulating market capitalization, and recent hourly volume was 1.8x the prior 24-hour hourly pace. If these data remain accurate and activity broadens rather than fades, CREPE could merit further investigation.
Bear case
The strongest bullish evidence is primarily market-structure and provider-reported data, not demonstrated product usage, community traction, or durable demand. Volume was down 37% versus the prior stored snapshot, while holder count and liquidity were unchanged. Tax or slippage can be modified, the external-call flag is set, and the negative honeypot check is not a guarantee. The neutral market regime and FLAT_24H narrative label provide no meaningful external tailwind.
What would invalidate it
The thesis would be materially weakened by a positive or inconsistent honeypot result, newly enabled or increased taxes/slippage, evidence that liquidity can be withdrawn abruptly, contract permissions that allow harmful changes, sustained volume deterioration, falling liquidity, or evidence that holder activity is non-organic or concentrated in related wallets. It would also be weakened if the reported pool is not the canonical market or if the observed age is misleading.
Missing information
- Verified contract ownership and administrative permissions.
- Whether liquidity is locked, burned, concentrated, or readily withdrawable.
- Top-holder concentration, deployer holdings, related wallets, and exchange or market-maker exposure.
- Verified trading volume, transaction count, spread, and slippage across time.
- Independent contract audit and detailed review of the external-call behavior.
- Project utility, roadmap, team, treasury, governance, community activity, and development history.
- Evidence that the observed pool is the primary or canonical market.
- Historical analogue outcome data with stored later market caps.
- The identity and quality of the sources used for the tax, honeypot, holder, and market-cap data.
Model gpt-5.6-luna. The model did not choose the scores.
Backtest context
Forward returns at 7, 30, 90, 180, and 365 days are recorded after those horizons elapse. Until the sample is large enough, no signal is described as predictive.
Source links