MukLDtJ8Cx9DxLbeyLRSWPSposTMWuwHANbuaudpump
Price change is displayed and is not an opportunity input. Pool age is the earliest observed pool, not a verified genesis date.
Change against this token's own earlier snapshots. This is not a prediction and not an opportunity score.
unknown
unknown
unknown
declining · coverage 7%
No early acceleration event at this measurement.
Not available. X is queried only for a capped set of in-universe tokens.
Economic share is the listed wallets and unlabeled contracts divided by supply that is not labeled as burn, pool, bridge, staking, or exchange. This uses the provider's top-holder list, not a full census. Infrastructure share of total supply is 5%.
Data confidence is separate from the opportunity coverage gate.
9 holder wallets were observed from this run. None have a measured historical track record, so none are qualified. A large balance is not smart money.
Smart money is evidence. It does not clear a honeypot, a malicious contract, extreme concentration, thin liquidity, or unsafe tokenomics.
Historical smart-money evidence: Not available. No free chart has been stored for this token yet.
Emerging wallet activity detected. 4B8s…pVdd AgmL…zN51 GLiC…ADng FHpc…7wCT
Emerging wallet activity is not a smart-money alert and does not mean these wallets are qualified.
Tracking starts when a wallet is seen buying a watch, discovery, or strong research token. A candidate is not smart money.
Not available. A missing GitHub link is not treated as proof that nobody is building.
Not available. Categories are attached only when a source assigns them.
Not available. Analogues require stored candidates at least 30 days older, with enough overlapping features.
These are arithmetic market-cap scenarios, not predictions and not probabilities.
This is a moderate-interest, high-speculation discovery candidate rather than a validated investment thesis. The token has substantial observed liquidity, roughly one-to-one FDV and circulating market cap, and 40.9 days of observed trading, but recent volume, liquidity, and holder-growth data are weak or flat. LP lock status, token distribution quality, smart-money participation, and verified genesis history remain unresolved.
Confidence: medium. The packet supplies several quantitative observations and complete inputs for its heuristic survival score, but important investability and fraud-risk information is missing. The conclusion is therefore reasonably supported as a screening assessment, not as a high-confidence investment recommendation.
The asset has $514,512 of liquidity against a $4.60 million market cap, has an observed pool age of 40.9 days, and shows FDV of approximately 1.0x circulating market cap. The deterministic opportunity score is 60.8 and the reported survival heuristic is 72.0, but these scores should be treated as screening outputs rather than proof of durability or upside.
The token has meaningful observed liquidity, at least relative to its market cap, and has survived at least 40.9 days of observed trading. FDV being approximately equal to circulating market cap suggests no obvious valuation gap from reported undistributed supply. The last-hour volume pace was 2.2x the recent 24-hour hourly average, which could indicate renewed short-term activity. These positives are tempered by the fact that liquidity is necessary but not evidence of quality, and the survival measure is explicitly not a probability forecast.
The recent trend is deteriorating: 24-hour volume declined 48% versus the prior stored snapshot and liquidity declined 10%. Holder count was unchanged, providing no evidence of expanding ownership. LP lock status is unknown, the age is not a verified genesis date, and smart-money data is unavailable. The risk-off market regime is unfavorable for microcaps. Without verified distribution, contract-risk, liquidity-lock, or team information, the opportunity score does not establish a compelling risk-adjusted thesis.
The thesis would be invalidated or materially weakened by evidence of removable or rapidly declining liquidity, malicious or privileged contract controls, severe holder concentration or insider selling, fabricated or wash-traded volume, persistent volume deterioration, or failure to maintain observed trading activity. Conversely, a single short-term volume spike should not by itself validate the thesis.
Model gpt-5.6-luna. The model did not choose the scores.
Forward returns at 7, 30, 90, 180, and 365 days are recorded after those horizons elapse. Until the sample is large enough, no signal is described as predictive.