Top discoveries
$JEANPHIL
Jean Phil · Solana
GTBxUiw6wJdmmkCGZgRHLyYxqu1vG4KtRpeox6yDpump
Overview
- Decision
- watch
- Opportunity
- 55/100
- Risk
- 6/100
- Survival
- 69/100
- Coverage
- 79%
- Model
- phase1.0
- Does not clear the discovery bar.
- opportunity 54.8 is below 60
- Enough independent evidence is stored to keep this on the watch list.
Why this is interesting
- Liquidity is $329,317 (at least $250k). Liquidity is necessary, not evidence of quality.
Why this might be wrong
- LP lock status is unknown. Unknown is not treated as locked.
- Does not clear the discovery bar.
- opportunity 54.8 is below 60
- Enough independent evidence is stored to keep this on the watch list.
Market data
- Market cap
- $4.31M
- FDV
- $4.31M
- Liquidity
- $329.3K
- 24h volume
- $292.2K
- Pool age
- 38 days
- 24h price change
- +21%
Price change is displayed and is not an opportunity input. Pool age is the earliest observed pool, not a verified genesis date.
Acceleration
Change against this token's own earlier snapshots. This is not a prediction and not an opportunity score.
Measured 2026-10-27 09:38:53.115446+00:00
Market
accelerating · coverage 100%
- 15m liquidity · unknown · -1% · complete
- 1h liquidity · flat · -1% · complete
- 24h liquidity · accelerating · +13% · complete
- 3d liquidity · unknown · -32% · complete
- 6h liquidity · declining · -2% · complete
- 7d liquidity · unknown · -32% · complete
- 15m liquidity_to_mcap · unknown · +2% · complete
- 1h liquidity_to_mcap · accelerating · +2% · complete
On-chain
declining · coverage 100%
- 15m active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 1h active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 24h active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 3d active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 6h active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 7d active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 15m buy_count · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 1h buy_count · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
Social
unknown
- 1h copy_ratio · unknown · Not available · stale
- 24h copy_ratio · unknown · Not available · stale
- 6h copy_ratio · unknown · Not available · stale
- 1h engagement · unknown · Not available · stale
- 24h engagement · unknown · Not available · stale
- 6h engagement · unknown · Not available · stale
- 1h mentions · unknown · Not available · stale
- 24h mentions · unknown · Not available · stale
Narrative
unknown · coverage 0%
- 6h solana-ecosystem · unknown · Not available · unavailable
- 6h meme-token · declining · -56% · complete
- 6h solana-meme-coins · unknown · Not available · unavailable
- 6h pump-fun · unknown · Not available · unavailable
- 6h tiktok-meme · unknown · Not available · partial
Early acceleration event
EARLY_ACCELERATION_EVENT · market, onchain, liquidity_volume
- market market_cap 24h · growth +29% · complete
- onchain holders 24h · growth +0% · complete
- liquidity_volume liquidity 24h · growth +13% · complete
- Context: token_entering_existing_narrative, token_in_flat_narrative
Social momentum
Not available. X is queried only for a capped set of in-universe tokens.
Holder concentration
- Raw top-list share
- +25%
- Economic share
- +22%
Economic share is the listed wallets and unlabeled contracts divided by supply that is not labeled as burn, pool, bridge, staking, or exchange. This uses the provider's top-holder list, not a full census. Infrastructure share of total supply is 4%.
Data confidence
- market
- 100%
- onchain
- 100%
- social
- 0%
- development
- 0%
- narrative
- 0%
- risk
- 80%
- overall
- 47%
Data confidence is separate from the opportunity coverage gate.
On-chain
- Recent volume is below the 24h pace.
- 24h volume changed 48% versus the prior stored snapshot.
- Liquidity changed 13% versus the prior stored snapshot.
- Holder count changed 0% versus the prior stored snapshot.
Smart money
- Signal
- Not available
- Qualified wallets
- 0
- High-confidence wallets
- 0
- Independent entities
- 0
- Independence
- Not available
- Accumulating
- 0
- Historical early-entry quality
- Not available
- Entry range fit
- Not available
- Coordination risk
- Not available
- Data confidence
- Not available
Why smart money matters
9 holder wallets were observed from this run. None have a measured historical track record, so none are qualified. A large balance is not smart money.
Smart money is evidence. It does not clear a honeypot, a malicious contract, extreme concentration, thin liquidity, or unsafe tokenomics.
Historical smart-money evidence: Not available. No free chart has been stored for this token yet.
Wallet tracking
- Tracked since
- 2026-09-27 00:36:16.460386+00:00
- Candidates
- 38
- Emerging
- 4
- Qualified
- 0
- High-confidence
- 0
- Independent entities
- 42
- Coordination risk
- LOW
Emerging wallet activity detected. 4B8s…pVdd GxDC…pXSq GLiC…ADng
Emerging wallet activity is not a smart-money alert and does not mean these wallets are qualified.
Tracking starts when a wallet is seen buying a watch, discovery, or strong research token. A candidate is not smart money.
Development
Not available. A missing GitHub link is not treated as proof that nobody is building.
Narrative
Not available. Categories are attached only when a source assigns them.
Tokenomics
- FDV is 1.0x circulating market cap.
Risk
- LP lock status is unknown. Unknown is not treated as locked.
Catalysts
- Sustained volume and holder growth across multiple snapshots rather than a single comparison period.
- Verification that LP is locked or burned for a meaningful duration.
- Evidence of broadening ownership and limited insider concentration.
- Demonstrable product, community, or narrative traction supported by independent data.
- Stable or improving liquidity accompanied by healthy trading activity.
- Verification of contract safety and absence of problematic administrative controls.
Historical analogues
Not available. Analogues require stored candidates at least 30 days older, with enough overlapping features.
10x / 100x / 1000x market-cap scenarios
- 10x market cap
- $43.08M
- 100x market cap
- $430.82M
- 1000x market cap
- $4.31B
These are arithmetic market-cap scenarios, not predictions and not probabilities.
- No historical sector maximum is stored in the local corpus, so precedent is not available. Absence of a stored precedent is not evidence against the scenario.
- No historical sector maximum is stored in the local corpus, so precedent is not available. Absence of a stored precedent is not evidence against the scenario.
- No historical sector maximum is stored in the local corpus, so precedent is not available. Absence of a stored precedent is not evidence against the scenario.
AI research rationale
JEANPHIL is an interesting but highly speculative Solana micro-cap discovery: it has approximately $9.43 million market capitalization, $485,308 liquidity, and 20 days of observed trading history, with a deterministic opportunity score of 61.2 and heuristic survival score of 75.0. The evidence supports liquidity and recent activity as reasons for further research, but does not establish durable demand, token quality, holder distribution, LP safety, team credibility, or long-term survivability. The thesis is not investable without materially better verification.
Confidence: medium. The packet contains several quantitative observations and complete inputs for the heuristic survival calculation, but the most important quality and downside variables remain unknown. The evidence supports further diligence, not a strong directional investment conclusion.
Why it is interesting
The token has meaningful observed liquidity relative to its market capitalization, full FDV-to-circulating-market-cap parity, recent volume growth, and positive holder-count change. It is also early enough that additional adoption could matter, although no evidence demonstrates that such adoption will occur.
Bull case
JEANPHIL may be sustaining active trading beyond an initial launch phase. Liquidity of $485,308 could support execution, while the reported 383% increase in 24-hour volume and 16% increase in holder count indicate potentially improving market participation. The 20% economic holder share and full input coverage may support the relatively high heuristic survival score, but these signals remain noisy and are not proof of organic growth or durability.
Bear case
The token may still be a short-lived speculative asset whose apparent momentum is driven by a low or stale comparison base. The 42% liquidity change could reflect unstable liquidity rather than healthy growth, and the 383% volume change lacks absolute volume context. LP lock status is unknown, the observed age is not a verified genesis date, smart-money information is unavailable, and there is no evidence of product utility, team accountability, distribution quality, or sustained demand. The survival score is explicitly not a probability of lasting 7, 30, or 90 days.
What would invalidate it
The thesis would be invalidated by evidence of unlocked or withdrawable liquidity controlled by insiders, severe holder or wallet concentration, malicious or overly powerful contract permissions, fabricated or wash-driven activity, sustained deterioration in liquidity or holders, or inability to verify the token and its stated market data.
Missing information
- Verified token launch/genesis date and complete trading history.
- LP lock or burn status, lock duration, and liquidity-provider ownership.
- Absolute 24-hour and historical trading volumes, including venue and wash-trading checks.
- Holder count, top-holder concentration, insider/team wallets, and vesting or unlock information.
- Contract permissions, mint authority, freeze authority, upgradeability, and exploit history.
- Team identity, project purpose, roadmap, product usage, and social/community authenticity.
- Market-cap and liquidity history sufficient to distinguish organic growth from short-term volatility.
- Stored historical analogue outcomes and any verified later market-cap observations.
- Smart-money participation data.
- Price performance and drawdown context, which the opportunity score explicitly does not use.
Model gpt-5.6-luna. The model did not choose the scores.
Backtest context
Forward returns at 7, 30, 90, 180, and 365 days are recorded after those horizons elapse. Until the sample is large enough, no signal is described as predictive.
Source links