Top discoveries

$Surplus

Surplus Intelligence · Base

0xc52aedec3374422d7510e294cfaa90799595cba3

Overview

Decision
watch
Opportunity
56/100
Risk
46/100
Survival
67/100
Coverage
71%
Model
phase1.0

Why this is interesting

Why this might be wrong

Market data

Market cap
$16.12M
FDV
$16.12M
Liquidity
$1.25M
24h volume
$171.8K
Pool age
163 days
24h price change
-8%

Price change is displayed and is not an opportunity input. Pool age is the earliest observed pool, not a verified genesis date.

Acceleration

Change against this token's own earlier snapshots. This is not a prediction and not an opportunity score.

Measured 2026-10-26 04:33:35.840937+00:00

Market

declining · coverage 100%

On-chain

declining · coverage 100%

Social

flat · coverage 100%

Narrative

flat · coverage 9%

No early acceleration event at this measurement.

Social momentum

Score 56/100 · confidence 0.55

Holder concentration

Raw top-list share
+28%
Economic share
+28%

Economic share is the listed wallets and unlabeled contracts divided by supply that is not labeled as burn, pool, bridge, staking, or exchange. This uses the provider's top-holder list, not a full census. Infrastructure share of total supply is 0%.

Data confidence

market
100%
onchain
100%
social
80%
development
0%
narrative
60%
risk
80%
overall
70%

Data confidence is separate from the opportunity coverage gate.

On-chain

Smart money

Signal
Not available
Qualified wallets
0
High-confidence wallets
0
Independent entities
0
Independence
Not available
Accumulating
0
Historical early-entry quality
Not available
Entry range fit
Not available
Coordination risk
Not available
Data confidence
Not available

Why smart money matters

6 holder wallets were observed from this run. None have a measured historical track record, so none are qualified. A large balance is not smart money.

Smart money is evidence. It does not clear a honeypot, a malicious contract, extreme concentration, thin liquidity, or unsafe tokenomics.

Historical smart-money evidence: Not available. No free chart has been stored for this token yet.

Wallet tracking

Tracked since
2026-09-26 23:59:58.342282+00:00
Candidates
114
Emerging
9
Qualified
0
High-confidence
0
Independent entities
122
Coordination risk
MEDIUM

Emerging wallet activity detected. 0x00…0e61 0x54…bc75 0x3b…caaf 0x91…1a48 0xbd…15b2

Emerging wallet activity is not a smart-money alert and does not mean these wallets are qualified.

Tracking starts when a wallet is seen buying a watch, discovery, or strong research token. A candidate is not smart money.

Development

Not available. A missing GitHub link is not treated as proof that nobody is building.

Narrative

Tokenomics

Risk

Catalysts

Historical analogues

Not available. Analogues require stored candidates at least 30 days older, with enough overlapping features.

10x / 100x / 1000x market-cap scenarios

10x market cap
$161.18M
100x market cap
$1.61B
1000x market cap
$16.12B

These are arithmetic market-cap scenarios, not predictions and not probabilities.

AI research rationale

Surplus is a moderately interesting discovery candidate, but not a validated investment thesis. The token has meaningful observed liquidity, roughly five months of observed trading, and a heuristic survival score of 70.0, yet mint capability, pausable transfers, majority-unlocked LP, low economic holder share, and weakening 24-hour volume create material downside and structural risks. The opportunity score of 60.1 should be treated as a screening output rather than evidence of expected returns.

Confidence: medium. The packet contains several concrete market, liquidity, age, contract-risk, and activity observations, with full survival inputs reported. Confidence is limited because the signals are provider-derived, the age is not verified genesis age, social and smart-money data are incomplete, no fundamental project information is supplied, and the available evidence includes important unresolved contract and liquidity risks.

Why it is interesting

The asset has approximately $17.7 million market capitalization and FDV, $1.31 million liquidity, and 161.6 days of observed pool age. Recent one-hour volume is above its 24-hour hourly pace, holder count has increased 14% versus the prior snapshot, and the reported sell tax is zero. These are potentially useful discovery signals, but they do not establish token quality, sustainable demand, or investability.

Bull case

Surplus may have achieved some market persistence, with 161.6 days of observed trading and over $1 million in liquidity. The negative honeypot check, reported zero sell tax, near-1.0x FDV-to-circulating-market-cap relationship, and recent increases in holder count and liquidity could support continued trading activity. The ELEVATED_24H narrative label and category median market-cap change of 14.1% may provide short-term attention, although this is not a full narrative score.

Bear case

The strongest concerns are contract and liquidity-control risks: mint capability is enabled, transfers can be paused, and a majority of LP is unlocked. Economic holder share is only 28%, while 24-hour volume declined 31% versus the prior snapshot. The observed age is not a verified genesis date, the honeypot result is not a guarantee, and the zero-tax flag is not an audit. Social momentum cannot be assessed because there is only one recent-search page, no second snapshot, and no sentiment data.

What would invalidate it

The discovery thesis would be invalidated by evidence of unauthorized or material supply expansion, inability to sell or transfer under normal conditions, withdrawal of substantial liquidity, highly concentrated control by insiders or deployers, fabricated or non-reproducible trading activity, or sustained deterioration in liquidity, volume, and holder metrics. It would also be weakened materially if the reported honeypot and zero-tax indicators fail independent testing.

Missing information

Model gpt-5.6-luna. The model did not choose the scores.

Backtest context

Forward returns at 7, 30, 90, 180, and 365 days are recorded after those horizons elapse. Until the sample is large enough, no signal is described as predictive.

Source links