Top discoveries
$BNKR
BankrCoin · Base
0x22af33fe49fd1fa80c7149773dde5890d3c76f3b
Overview
- Decision
- watch
- Opportunity
- 60/100
- Risk
- 20/100
- Survival
- 73/100
- Coverage
- 83%
- Model
- phase1.0
- Does not clear the discovery bar.
- observed age is over 180 days and no acceleration is stored yet. Age and liquidity alone are not an early signal.
- Enough independent evidence is stored to keep this on the watch list.
Why this is interesting
- Liquidity is $2,200,462 (at least $1M). Liquidity is necessary, not evidence of quality.
Why this might be wrong
- Economic holders control 54%.
- A majority of LP is unlocked on the provider report.
- Does not clear the discovery bar.
- observed age is over 180 days and no acceleration is stored yet. Age and liquidity alone are not an early signal.
- Enough independent evidence is stored to keep this on the watch list.
Market data
- Market cap
- $32.08M
- FDV
- $30.96M
- Liquidity
- $2.20M
- 24h volume
- $201.0K
- Pool age
- 675 days
- 24h price change
- -0%
Price change is displayed and is not an opportunity input. Pool age is the earliest observed pool, not a verified genesis date.
Acceleration
Change against this token's own earlier snapshots. This is not a prediction and not an opportunity score.
Measured 2026-10-26 05:37:53.023332+00:00
Market
unknown
- 15m liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 1h liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 24h liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 3d liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 6h liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 7d liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 15m liquidity_to_mcap · unknown · Not available · stale
- 1h liquidity_to_mcap · unknown · Not available · stale
On-chain
unknown
- 15m active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 1h active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 24h active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 3d active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 6h active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 7d active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 15m buy_count · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 1h buy_count · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
Social
unknown
- Unknown. Not enough earlier snapshots in this domain.
Narrative
unknown · coverage 9%
- 6h artificial-intelligence · unknown · Not available · partial
- 6h base-ecosystem · accelerating · +30% · complete
- 6h ai-agents · unknown · Not available · unavailable
- 6h ai-applications · unknown · Not available · unavailable
- 6h clanker-ecosystem · flat · +0% · complete
- 6h defai · unknown · Not available · unavailable
- 6h x402-ecosystem · unknown · Not available · unavailable
- 6h base-native · flat · -7% · complete
- 6h robinhood-ecosystem · unknown · Not available · unavailable
No early acceleration event at this measurement.
Social momentum
Not available. X is queried only for a capped set of in-universe tokens.
Holder concentration
- Raw top-list share
- +54%
- Economic share
- +54%
Economic share is the listed wallets and unlabeled contracts divided by supply that is not labeled as burn, pool, bridge, staking, or exchange. This uses the provider's top-holder list, not a full census. Infrastructure share of total supply is 7%.
Data confidence
- market
- 100%
- onchain
- 100%
- social
- 0%
- development
- 0%
- narrative
- 0%
- risk
- 80%
- overall
- 47%
Data confidence is separate from the opportunity coverage gate.
On-chain
- Recent volume is below the 24h pace.
- 24h volume changed -17% versus the prior stored snapshot.
- Liquidity changed -1% versus the prior stored snapshot.
- Holder count changed 0% versus the prior stored snapshot.
Smart money
- Signal
- Not available
- Qualified wallets
- 0
- High-confidence wallets
- 0
- Independent entities
- 0
- Independence
- Not available
- Accumulating
- 0
- Historical early-entry quality
- Not available
- Entry range fit
- Not available
- Coordination risk
- Not available
- Data confidence
- Not available
Why smart money matters
7 holder wallets were observed from this run. None have a measured historical track record, so none are qualified. A large balance is not smart money.
Smart money is evidence. It does not clear a honeypot, a malicious contract, extreme concentration, thin liquidity, or unsafe tokenomics.
Historical smart-money evidence: Not available. No free chart has been stored for this token yet.
Wallet tracking
- Tracked since
- 2026-09-26 23:59:58.342282+00:00
- Candidates
- 57
- Emerging
- 6
- Qualified
- 0
- High-confidence
- 0
- Independent entities
- 63
- Coordination risk
- LOW
Tracking starts when a wallet is seen buying a watch, discovery, or strong research token. A candidate is not smart money.
Development
Not available. A missing GitHub link is not treated as proof that nobody is building.
Narrative
Not available. Categories are attached only when a source assigns them.
Tokenomics
- FDV is 1.0x circulating market cap.
- Reported sell tax is 0. This is a provider flag, not an audit.
Risk
- Economic holders control 54%.
- A majority of LP is unlocked on the provider report.
Catalysts
- Sustained volume growth across multiple snapshots without further liquidity deterioration.
- Stable or increasing liquidity with clearer LP lock or provider information.
- Growth in holder count and improved ownership distribution.
- Independent confirmation of contract safety, transfer permissions, and tax behavior.
- A shift from the current risk-off regime to stronger microcap risk appetite.
Historical analogues
Not available. Analogues require stored candidates at least 30 days older, with enough overlapping features.
10x / 100x / 1000x market-cap scenarios
- 10x market cap
- $320.76M
- 100x market cap
- $3.21B
- 1000x market cap
- $32.08B
These are arithmetic market-cap scenarios, not predictions and not probabilities.
- No historical sector maximum is stored in the local corpus, so precedent is not available. Absence of a stored precedent is not evidence against the scenario.
- No historical sector maximum is stored in the local corpus, so precedent is not available. Absence of a stored precedent is not evidence against the scenario.
- No historical sector maximum is stored in the local corpus, so precedent is not available. Absence of a stored precedent is not evidence against the scenario.
AI research rationale
BNKR is a moderately interesting but unproven discovery candidate, not a high-conviction opportunity. Its approximately 675-day observed trading history, roughly $2.2M liquidity, negative honeypot checks, and recent volume acceleration support survivability and tradability. However, the thesis is weakened by unlocked LP exposure, only 54% economic-holder control, a risk-off market regime, recent liquidity contraction, limited holder growth, and the absence of smart-money or verified genesis information. The deterministic opportunity score of 61.2 and survival score of 73.0 should be treated as screening outputs rather than proof of future performance.
Confidence: medium. The packet provides reasonably broad coverage at 0.745 and several concrete market-structure observations, but important quality, ownership, contract, and demand data are missing. The positive signals are therefore sufficient for monitoring, not for a high-confidence thesis.
Why it is interesting
BNKR combines meaningful reported liquidity, FDV close to circulating market capitalization, a long observed pool history, and a recent 262% increase in 24-hour volume versus the prior snapshot. These features make it worthy of monitoring, but they do not establish token quality, durable demand, or an attractive valuation.
Bull case
The token may have relatively durable market infrastructure: observed trading age is 674.6 days, liquidity is approximately $2.22M, reported sell tax is zero, and honeypot checks were negative on the sources that ran. The recent volume increase could indicate renewed attention, while FDV being approximately 1.0x circulating market cap limits dilution concerns based on the supplied data. If liquidity remains stable and the volume increase develops into sustained demand, BNKR could merit greater research attention.
Bear case
The recent volume increase may be temporary rather than evidence of durable adoption. Liquidity declined 6%, holder count was flat, and a majority of LP is reportedly unlocked, creating potential liquidity-withdrawal risk. Economic holders control only 54%, which leaves substantial ownership outside the measured economic-holder group and does not establish healthy distribution. The broader regime is risk-off, the narrative signal is flat, smart-money data is unavailable, and the pool age is not a verified genesis date.
What would invalidate it
The thesis would be materially weakened or invalidated by evidence of a contract-level sell or transfer restriction, materially worsening liquidity or LP withdrawal, sustained volume reversion without holder growth, concentrated insider or team ownership, or confirmation that reported tax, honeypot, or market data is inaccurate. A single adverse snapshot would be a warning; persistent deterioration across snapshots would be stronger invalidation.
Missing information
- Verified token deployment and genesis history beyond the earliest observed pool.
- Holder count, top-holder concentration, team allocation, treasury holdings, and vesting schedules.
- LP provider identity, exact unlock schedule, and whether liquidity is actively managed.
- Contract audit, privileged-role analysis, pause or blacklist controls, and transfer-restriction review.
- Volume composition, wash-trading analysis, exchange or pool concentration, and unique active trader trends.
- Revenue, product usage, protocol fundamentals, or other non-speculative sources of demand.
- Verified smart-money activity.
- Historical analogue outcomes; no stored analogue evidence was provided.
Model gpt-5.6-luna. The model did not choose the scores.
Backtest context
Forward returns at 7, 30, 90, 180, and 365 days are recorded after those horizons elapse. Until the sample is large enough, no signal is described as predictive.
Source links