Top discoveries

$中国人能飞

中国人能飞火箭 · BNB Chain

0x108876c3df3d893350e9b780563b3697aa3e7777

Overview

Decision
watch
Opportunity
55/100
Risk
12/100
Survival
66/100
Coverage
83%
Model
phase1.0

Why this is interesting

Why this might be wrong

Market data

Market cap
$2.32M
FDV
$2.32M
Liquidity
$204.2K
24h volume
$2.33M
Pool age
12 days
24h price change
-3%

Price change is displayed and is not an opportunity input. Pool age is the earliest observed pool, not a verified genesis date.

Acceleration

Change against this token's own earlier snapshots. This is not a prediction and not an opportunity score.

Measured 2026-10-26 03:29:28.602236+00:00

Market

unknown

On-chain

unknown

Social

unknown

Narrative

declining · coverage 8%

No early acceleration event at this measurement.

Social momentum

Not available. X is queried only for a capped set of in-universe tokens.

Holder concentration

Raw top-list share
+15%
Economic share
+11%

Economic share is the listed wallets and unlabeled contracts divided by supply that is not labeled as burn, pool, bridge, staking, or exchange. This uses the provider's top-holder list, not a full census. Infrastructure share of total supply is 5%.

Data confidence

market
100%
onchain
100%
social
0%
development
0%
narrative
0%
risk
80%
overall
47%

Data confidence is separate from the opportunity coverage gate.

On-chain

Smart money

Signal
Not available
Qualified wallets
0
High-confidence wallets
0
Independent entities
0
Independence
Not available
Accumulating
0
Historical early-entry quality
Not available
Entry range fit
Not available
Coordination risk
Not available
Data confidence
Not available

Why smart money matters

4 holder wallets were observed from this run. None have a measured historical track record, so none are qualified. A large balance is not smart money.

Smart money is evidence. It does not clear a honeypot, a malicious contract, extreme concentration, thin liquidity, or unsafe tokenomics.

Historical smart-money evidence: Not available. No free chart has been stored for this token yet.

Wallet tracking

Tracked since
2026-09-27 00:36:07.185348+00:00
Candidates
90
Emerging
1
Qualified
0
High-confidence
0
Independent entities
91
Coordination risk
LOW

Tracking starts when a wallet is seen buying a watch, discovery, or strong research token. A candidate is not smart money.

Development

Not available. A missing GitHub link is not treated as proof that nobody is building.

Narrative

Not available. Categories are attached only when a source assigns them.

Tokenomics

Risk

Catalysts

Historical analogues

Not available. Analogues require stored candidates at least 30 days older, with enough overlapping features.

10x / 100x / 1000x market-cap scenarios

10x market cap
$23.22M
100x market cap
$232.25M
1000x market cap
$2.32B

These are arithmetic market-cap scenarios, not predictions and not probabilities.

AI research rationale

This is a speculative, early-stage BSC token that ranks as a top discovery under the supplied deterministic scoring, but the evidence is insufficient to establish durable quality or investability. The 63.4 opportunity score and 72.0 survival score should not be interpreted as a forecast; the token has only 8.1 days of observed trading, majority-unlocked LP, limited economic holder share, and potentially noisy activity.

Confidence: medium. The packet contains several quantitative observations and reports 74.2% coverage, but the asset is only observed for 8.1 days, key security and ownership information is missing, LP is mostly unlocked, and the main growth signals may be noisy. The scores are therefore useful for triage but not sufficient for a high-confidence investment conclusion.

Why it is interesting

The token has approximately $9.42 million market capitalization and FDV, about $384,254 of liquidity, a reported negative honeypot check, and recent increases in volume, holders, and liquidity. Its opportunity score of 63.4 and survival score of 72.0 make it notable for further diligence, but these scores are heuristic and mechanically computed.

Bull case

The token has meaningful reported liquidity, with FDV equal to circulating market capitalization, suggesting no stated FDV-to-circulating-cap overhang in the supplied data. Observed holder count, liquidity, and 24-hour volume all increased versus prior snapshots, while the last-hour volume was materially above its recent hourly pace. The honeypot checks that ran were negative. If these changes reflect genuine organic adoption and liquidity remains stable or becomes better secured, the token could continue to attract attention.

Bear case

The token is extremely early by observed pool age, and that age is not a verified genesis date. A majority of LP is unlocked, creating material liquidity-withdrawal risk. The economic holder share is only 11%, and recent activity may be distorted by wash trading or short-lived speculation. The negative honeypot result is not a guarantee of safe trading, and the supplied evidence does not establish contract quality, team credibility, organic community growth, or sustainable demand.

What would invalidate it

The constructive thesis would be weakened or invalidated by a material liquidity withdrawal, inability to sell despite prior checks, sharp reversal in holders or liquidity, evidence of wash trading or concentrated insider control, newly identified contract privileges, or failure to sustain activity beyond the initial observed period.

Missing information

Model gpt-5.6-luna. The model did not choose the scores.

Backtest context

Forward returns at 7, 30, 90, 180, and 365 days are recorded after those horizons elapse. Until the sample is large enough, no signal is described as predictive.

Source links