Top discoveries
$BOB
Build On BNB · BNB Chain
0x51363f073b1e4920fda7aa9e9d84ba97ede1560e
Overview
- Decision
- watch
- Opportunity
- 58/100
- Risk
- 14/100
- Survival
- 67/100
- Coverage
- 74%
- Model
- phase1.0
- Does not clear the discovery bar.
- opportunity 57.6 is below 60
- observed age is over 180 days and no acceleration is stored yet. Age and liquidity alone are not an early signal.
- Enough independent evidence is stored to keep this on the watch list.
Why this is interesting
- Liquidity is $935,643 (at least $250k). Liquidity is necessary, not evidence of quality.
Why this might be wrong
- Economic holders control 77%.
- Does not clear the discovery bar.
- opportunity 57.6 is below 60
- observed age is over 180 days and no acceleration is stored yet. Age and liquidity alone are not an early signal.
- Enough independent evidence is stored to keep this on the watch list.
Market data
- Market cap
- $3.41M
- FDV
- $3.40M
- Liquidity
- $935.6K
- 24h volume
- $314.1K
- Pool age
- 692 days
- 24h price change
- -12%
Price change is displayed and is not an opportunity input. Pool age is the earliest observed pool, not a verified genesis date.
Acceleration
Change against this token's own earlier snapshots. This is not a prediction and not an opportunity score.
Measured 2026-10-26 05:37:53.023332+00:00
Market
unknown
- 15m liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 1h liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 24h liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 3d liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 6h liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 7d liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 15m liquidity_to_mcap · unknown · Not available · stale
- 1h liquidity_to_mcap · unknown · Not available · stale
On-chain
unknown
- 15m active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 1h active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 24h active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 3d active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 6h active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 7d active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 15m buy_count · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 1h buy_count · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
Social
unknown
- Unknown. Not enough earlier snapshots in this domain.
Narrative
flat · coverage 8%
- 6h binance-smart-chain · flat · -4% · complete
- 6h meme-token · flat · +9% · complete
- 6h binance-alpha-spotlight · accelerating · +147% · complete
No early acceleration event at this measurement.
Social momentum
Not available. X is queried only for a capped set of in-universe tokens.
Holder concentration
- Raw top-list share
- +80%
- Economic share
- +77%
Economic share is the listed wallets and unlabeled contracts divided by supply that is not labeled as burn, pool, bridge, staking, or exchange. This uses the provider's top-holder list, not a full census. Infrastructure share of total supply is 13%.
Data confidence
- market
- 100%
- onchain
- 100%
- social
- 0%
- development
- 0%
- narrative
- 60%
- risk
- 80%
- overall
- 57%
Data confidence is separate from the opportunity coverage gate.
On-chain
- Recent volume is close to the 24h pace.
- 24h volume changed -14% versus the prior stored snapshot.
- Liquidity changed -4% versus the prior stored snapshot.
- Holder count changed -0% versus the prior stored snapshot.
Smart money
- Signal
- Not available
- Qualified wallets
- 0
- High-confidence wallets
- 0
- Independent entities
- 0
- Independence
- Not available
- Accumulating
- 0
- Historical early-entry quality
- Not available
- Entry range fit
- Not available
- Coordination risk
- Not available
- Data confidence
- Not available
Why smart money matters
7 holder wallets were observed from this run. None have a measured historical track record, so none are qualified. A large balance is not smart money.
Smart money is evidence. It does not clear a honeypot, a malicious contract, extreme concentration, thin liquidity, or unsafe tokenomics.
Historical smart-money evidence: Not available. No free chart has been stored for this token yet.
Wallet tracking
- Tracked since
- 2026-09-27 00:36:07.185348+00:00
- Candidates
- 63
- Emerging
- 0
- Qualified
- 0
- High-confidence
- 0
- Independent entities
- 60
- Coordination risk
- MEDIUM
Tracking starts when a wallet is seen buying a watch, discovery, or strong research token. A candidate is not smart money.
Development
Not available. A missing GitHub link is not treated as proof that nobody is building.
Narrative
- Narrative label FLAT_24H. Median sourced category market-cap change is -2.9% over 24h.
- A single 24h category move is not labeled HIGH and is not a multi-signal narrative score.
- The token name was not used to invent a category.
Tokenomics
- FDV is 1.0x circulating market cap.
- Reported sell tax is 0. This is a provider flag, not an audit.
Risk
- Economic holders control 77%.
Catalysts
- Sustained elevated volume accompanied by increasing holder count rather than a one-period spike.
- Recovery or growth in liquidity after the reported 6% decline.
- Independent verification of contract security, liquidity-lock arrangements, and absence of privileged harmful permissions.
- Evidence of real product usage, credible development, or a well-supported project catalyst.
- Improved wallet distribution and lower economic-holder concentration.
- New verifiable market access or integrations; currently unknown / insufficient data.
Historical analogues
Not available. Analogues require stored candidates at least 30 days older, with enough overlapping features.
10x / 100x / 1000x market-cap scenarios
- 10x market cap
- $34.10M
- 100x market cap
- $341.04M
- 1000x market cap
- $3.41B
These are arithmetic market-cap scenarios, not predictions and not probabilities.
- No historical sector maximum is stored in the local corpus, so precedent is not available. Absence of a stored precedent is not evidence against the scenario.
- No historical sector maximum is stored in the local corpus, so precedent is not available. Absence of a stored precedent is not evidence against the scenario.
- No historical sector maximum is stored in the local corpus, so precedent is not available. Absence of a stored precedent is not evidence against the scenario.
AI research rationale
BOB is a moderately interesting discovery candidate, but the evidence supports monitoring rather than a strong investment thesis. The combination of approximately $3.9M market capitalization, approximately $1.0M liquidity, 689.7 days of observed trading, and a negative honeypot check is constructive. However, the thesis is weakened by 75% economic-holder concentration, flat holder count, 6% liquidity decline, limited narrative momentum, unavailable smart-money data, and uncertainty about whether the observed age reflects the token's true genesis.
Confidence: medium. The packet provides a reasonably complete set of deterministic market, liquidity, age, and risk inputs, reflected in 0.742 coverage and five of five survival inputs present. Confidence remains limited because the data does not establish token genesis, holder-quality distribution, contract security, the cause of the volume spike, project fundamentals, or smart-money participation.
Why it is interesting
The token has substantial liquidity relative to its market capitalization, an observed trading history approaching two years, a fully diluted valuation close to circulating market capitalization, and no reported sell tax according to the provider flag. A large recent volume increase may warrant investigation, although it is not validated as sustained demand and recent volume is described as close to the 24-hour pace.
Bull case
BOB may have relatively strong tradability and survivability for a small-cap token: liquidity is approximately $1.0M, representing 25.9% of market capitalization; observed trading age is 689.7 days; FDV is approximately 1.0x circulating market capitalization; and the honeypot check was negative on the sources that ran. If the 995% volume increase represents genuine and sustained participation rather than a temporary event, it could improve market attention. The 0% reported sell tax is also directionally favorable, but it is only a provider flag rather than an audit.
Bear case
The token lacks a demonstrated durable growth or narrative thesis. Holder count was unchanged, liquidity declined 6%, and economic holders control 75%, creating concentration and exit-liquidity concerns. The recent 995% volume change is difficult to interpret without absolute volume, timing, wallet-level attribution, or evidence of persistence. The neutral market regime and FLAT_24H narrative label provide little external support. The observed age is not a verified genesis date, and a negative honeypot check is not a guarantee against other contract, governance, or market risks.
What would invalidate it
The thesis would be materially weakened by evidence that the reported liquidity is removable or controlled by concentrated insiders, that the contract permits harmful owner actions, that the volume spike is wash trading or a brief isolated event, that sellability differs from the provider check, or that economic-holder concentration leads to substantial selling. Sustained holder stagnation and further liquidity deterioration would also undermine the survivability case.
Missing information
- Absolute and historical volume, including the duration and source of the 995% increase.
- Wallet concentration breakdown beyond the 75% economic-holder figure, including deployer, treasury, exchange, LP, and contract-held balances.
- Contract audit status, ownership controls, minting ability, blacklist or pause functions, and upgradeability.
- Verified genesis date and project launch history.
- Project utility, roadmap, team, treasury, governance, and active development evidence.
- Liquidity-lock status, LP ownership, lock duration, and withdrawal permissions.
- Exchange availability and market-depth or slippage data.
- Independent confirmation of the reported sell-tax and honeypot results.
- Smart-money or high-quality holder activity.
- Historical analogue outcome details; no specific analogue outcomes are supplied.
Model gpt-5.6-luna. The model did not choose the scores.
Backtest context
Forward returns at 7, 30, 90, 180, and 365 days are recorded after those horizons elapse. Until the sample is large enough, no signal is described as predictive.
Source links