Top discoveries
$ASTEROID
Asteroid Shiba · Ethereum
0xf280b16ef293d8e534e370794ef26bf312694126
Overview
- Decision
- watch
- Opportunity
- 56/100
- Risk
- 0/100
- Survival
- 83/100
- Coverage
- 71%
- Model
- phase1.0
- Does not clear the discovery bar.
- opportunity 55.8 is below 60
- observed age is over 180 days and no acceleration is stored yet. Age and liquidity alone are not an early signal.
- Enough independent evidence is stored to keep this on the watch list.
Why this is interesting
- Liquidity is $796,319 (at least $250k). Liquidity is necessary, not evidence of quality.
Why this might be wrong
- No material risk flag fired on the inputs that were present.
- Does not clear the discovery bar.
- opportunity 55.8 is below 60
- observed age is over 180 days and no acceleration is stored yet. Age and liquidity alone are not an early signal.
- Enough independent evidence is stored to keep this on the watch list.
Market data
- Market cap
- $3.37M
- FDV
- $3.37M
- Liquidity
- $796.3K
- 24h volume
- $41.7K
- Pool age
- 775 days
- 24h price change
- -4%
Price change is displayed and is not an opportunity input. Pool age is the earliest observed pool, not a verified genesis date.
Acceleration
Change against this token's own earlier snapshots. This is not a prediction and not an opportunity score.
Measured 2026-10-26 05:37:53.023332+00:00
Market
flat · coverage 100%
- 15m liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 1h liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 24h liquidity · flat · -2% · complete
- 3d liquidity · unknown · -22% · complete
- 6h liquidity · unknown · Not available · stale
- 7d liquidity · unknown · -22% · complete
- 15m liquidity_to_mcap · unknown · Not available · stale
- 1h liquidity_to_mcap · unknown · Not available · stale
On-chain
flat · coverage 100%
- 15m active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 1h active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 24h active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 3d active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 6h active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 7d active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 15m buy_count · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 1h buy_count · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
Social
unknown · coverage 100%
- 1h copy_ratio · unknown · Not available · stale
- 24h copy_ratio · unknown · -35% · complete
- 6h copy_ratio · unknown · Not available · stale
- 1h engagement · unknown · Not available · stale
- 24h engagement · unknown · -63% · complete
- 6h engagement · unknown · Not available · stale
- 1h mentions · unknown · Not available · stale
- 24h mentions · unknown · -23% · complete
Narrative
flat · coverage 10%
- 6h meme-token · flat · +9% · complete
- 6h ethereum-ecosystem · unknown · Not available · unavailable
- 6h dog-themed-coins · unknown · Not available · unavailable
No early acceleration event at this measurement.
Social momentum
Score 56/100 · confidence 0.55
- Recent-search page contains 36 posts. This is one page, not the full history.
- Authors on this page are somewhat distributed.
- Unique authors changed -6% versus the prior stored snapshot.
- Mentions changed -23% versus the prior stored snapshot.
- Sentiment is not available. Mention count alone is not treated as community quality.
Holder concentration
- Raw top-list share
- +25%
- Economic share
- +15%
Economic share is the listed wallets and unlabeled contracts divided by supply that is not labeled as burn, pool, bridge, staking, or exchange. This uses the provider's top-holder list, not a full census. Infrastructure share of total supply is 12%.
Data confidence
- market
- 100%
- onchain
- 100%
- social
- 80%
- development
- 0%
- narrative
- 60%
- risk
- 80%
- overall
- 70%
Data confidence is separate from the opportunity coverage gate.
On-chain
- Recent volume is below the 24h pace.
- 24h volume changed -54% versus the prior stored snapshot.
- Liquidity changed -3% versus the prior stored snapshot.
- Holder count changed 0% versus the prior stored snapshot.
Smart money
- Signal
- Not available
- Qualified wallets
- 0
- High-confidence wallets
- 0
- Independent entities
- 0
- Independence
- Not available
- Accumulating
- 0
- Historical early-entry quality
- Not available
- Entry range fit
- Not available
- Coordination risk
- Not available
- Data confidence
- Not available
Why smart money matters
5 holder wallets were observed from this run. None have a measured historical track record, so none are qualified. A large balance is not smart money.
Smart money is evidence. It does not clear a honeypot, a malicious contract, extreme concentration, thin liquidity, or unsafe tokenomics.
Historical smart-money evidence: Not available. No free chart has been stored for this token yet.
Wallet tracking
- Tracked since
- 2026-09-27 02:11:05.476089+00:00
- Candidates
- 28
- Emerging
- 0
- Qualified
- 0
- High-confidence
- 0
- Independent entities
- 28
- Coordination risk
- LOW
Tracking starts when a wallet is seen buying a watch, discovery, or strong research token. A candidate is not smart money.
Development
Not available. A missing GitHub link is not treated as proof that nobody is building.
Narrative
- Narrative label FLAT_24H. Median sourced category market-cap change is -1.0% over 24h.
- A single 24h category move is not labeled HIGH and is not a multi-signal narrative score.
- The token name was not used to invent a category.
Tokenomics
- FDV is 1.0x circulating market cap.
- Reported sell tax is 0. This is a provider flag, not an audit.
Risk
- No material risk flag fired on the inputs that were present.
Catalysts
- A sustained reversal in volume and liquidity trends would improve the demand and market-quality case.
- Independent verification of contract security, ownership controls, liquidity lock status, and holder distribution could reduce uncertainty.
- Evidence of genuine product usage, revenue, or adoption could provide fundamentals beyond market-structure metrics.
- A sustained increase in holder count and economic holder share could support a broader ownership thesis.
Historical analogues
Not available. Analogues require stored candidates at least 30 days older, with enough overlapping features.
10x / 100x / 1000x market-cap scenarios
- 10x market cap
- $33.66M
- 100x market cap
- $336.58M
- 1000x market cap
- $3.37B
These are arithmetic market-cap scenarios, not predictions and not probabilities.
- No historical sector maximum is stored in the local corpus, so precedent is not available. Absence of a stored precedent is not evidence against the scenario.
- No historical sector maximum is stored in the local corpus, so precedent is not available. Absence of a stored precedent is not evidence against the scenario.
- No historical sector maximum is stored in the local corpus, so precedent is not available. Absence of a stored precedent is not evidence against the scenario.
AI research rationale
ASTEROID is a speculative discovery candidate, not a validated investment opportunity. Its strongest observable positives are approximately $818,854 of liquidity, a 1.0x FDV-to-market-cap relationship, and 774.6 days of observed trading age. However, the evidence also shows 24-hour volume down 52%, liquidity down 20%, only 15% economic holder share, and no available smart-money or verified fundamental information. The deterministic opportunity score of 66.4 and survival score of 83.0 should be treated as screening outputs rather than forecasts.
Confidence: medium. The packet contains several market-structure observations and reports 82.8% coverage, but critical information about contract security, ownership concentration, liquidity control, fundamentals, and historical outcomes is absent. The deterministic scores are therefore useful for screening but insufficient for a high-confidence investment conclusion.
Why it is interesting
The token has meaningful reported liquidity relative to its approximately $3.5 million market capitalization, with liquidity equal to 23.4% of market cap. It also has a long observed pool history and no detected honeypot issue on the sources that ran. These characteristics may justify further diligence, but they do not establish sustainable demand, token quality, or upside.
Bull case
ASTEROID could be more resilient than a newly launched token because the observed pool has existed for 774.6 days, liquidity is reported at $818,854, FDV is approximately equal to circulating market cap, and the reported sell tax is zero. Recent last-hour volume is 2.4x the 24-hour hourly pace, which could indicate renewed activity. The positive interpretation is weakened by declining 24-hour volume and liquidity, and by the absence of verified information about the project or its holders.
Bear case
The token may be experiencing deteriorating participation or liquidity: 24-hour volume is down 52% versus the prior snapshot and liquidity is down 20%. Economic holder share is only 15%, while holder count is unchanged, which does not demonstrate expanding ownership or demand. The observed age is not a verified genesis date, the honeypot result is not a guarantee, and there is no smart-money data or historical analogue outcome supplied. The zero risk score means no material flag fired on available inputs, not that the asset is low risk.
What would invalidate it
The constructive case would be invalidated by evidence of contract backdoors or transfer restrictions, materially inaccessible or removable liquidity, concentrated insider control, fabricated or unreliable market data, persistent further declines in volume and liquidity, or evidence that the observed pool history does not represent continuous genuine trading.
Missing information
- Verified project identity, website, documentation, team, and utility: Unknown / insufficient data.
- Contract ownership, minting, blacklist, pause, upgrade, and other privileged functions: Unknown / insufficient data.
- Top-holder concentration and wallet distribution: Unknown / insufficient data.
- Liquidity lock status, market-maker composition, and withdrawal permissions: Unknown / insufficient data.
- Trading venue coverage and exchange/listing quality: Unknown / insufficient data.
- Audited contract and independent security review: Unknown / insufficient data.
- Revenue, treasury, protocol usage, users, and fundamental adoption: Unknown / insufficient data.
- Reliable historical analogue outcomes: Unknown / insufficient data.
- Reason for the recent volume and liquidity declines: Unknown / insufficient data.
Model gpt-5.6-luna. The model did not choose the scores.
Backtest context
Forward returns at 7, 30, 90, 180, and 365 days are recorded after those horizons elapse. Until the sample is large enough, no signal is described as predictive.
Source links