Top discoveries
$WKC
WIKI CAT · BNB Chain
0x6ec90334d89dbdc89e08a133271be3d104128edb
Overview
- Decision
- watch
- Opportunity
- 56/100
- Risk
- 6/100
- Survival
- 83/100
- Coverage
- 71%
- Model
- phase1.0
- Does not clear the discovery bar.
- opportunity 55.5 is below 60
- observed age is over 180 days and no acceleration is stored yet. Age and liquidity alone are not an early signal.
- Enough independent evidence is stored to keep this on the watch list.
Why this is interesting
- Liquidity is $1,096,304 (at least $1M). Liquidity is necessary, not evidence of quality.
Why this might be wrong
- LP lock status is unknown. Unknown is not treated as locked.
- Does not clear the discovery bar.
- opportunity 55.5 is below 60
- observed age is over 180 days and no acceleration is stored yet. Age and liquidity alone are not an early signal.
- Enough independent evidence is stored to keep this on the watch list.
Market data
- Market cap
- $33.19M
- FDV
- $33.19M
- Liquidity
- $1.10M
- 24h volume
- $44.7K
- Pool age
- 1681 days
- 24h price change
- -2%
Price change is displayed and is not an opportunity input. Pool age is the earliest observed pool, not a verified genesis date.
Acceleration
Change against this token's own earlier snapshots. This is not a prediction and not an opportunity score.
Measured 2026-10-26 04:33:35.840937+00:00
Market
accelerating · coverage 100%
- 15m liquidity · unknown · +0% · complete
- 1h liquidity · accelerating · +0% · complete
- 24h liquidity · unknown · -1% · complete
- 3d liquidity · unknown · -1% · complete
- 6h liquidity · accelerating · +1% · complete
- 7d liquidity · unknown · -1% · complete
- 15m liquidity_to_mcap · unknown · +1% · complete
- 1h liquidity_to_mcap · accelerating · +1% · complete
On-chain
flat · coverage 100%
- 15m active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 1h active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 24h active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 3d active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 6h active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 7d active_wallets · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 15m buy_count · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
- 1h buy_count · unknown · Not available · partial · zero observed
Social
declining · coverage 100%
- 1h copy_ratio · unknown · Not available · stale
- 24h copy_ratio · unknown · +114% · complete
- 6h copy_ratio · declining · -66% · complete
- 1h engagement · unknown · Not available · stale
- 24h engagement · unknown · +113% · complete
- 6h engagement · accelerating · +89% · complete
- 1h mentions · unknown · Not available · stale
- 24h mentions · unknown · -6% · complete
Narrative
declining · coverage 8%
- 6h binance-smart-chain · declining · -40% · complete
- 6h meme-token · accelerating · +162% · complete
- 6h cat-themed-coins · accelerating · +190% · complete
Early acceleration event
EARLY_ACCELERATION_EVENT · market, social, liquidity_volume
- market market_cap 6h · growth +3% · complete
- social mentions 6h · growth +190% · complete
- liquidity_volume liquidity 1h · growth +0% · complete
- Context: token_entering_existing_narrative, token_in_flat_narrative
Social momentum
Score 40/100 · confidence 0.55
- Recent-search page contains 29 posts. This is one page, not the full history.
- Unique authors changed 14% versus the prior stored snapshot.
- Mentions changed -6% versus the prior stored snapshot.
- Sentiment is not available. Mention count alone is not treated as community quality.
Holder concentration
- Raw top-list share
- +7%
- Economic share
- +10%
Economic share is the listed wallets and unlabeled contracts divided by supply that is not labeled as burn, pool, bridge, staking, or exchange. This uses the provider's top-holder list, not a full census. Infrastructure share of total supply is 37%.
Data confidence
- market
- 100%
- onchain
- 100%
- social
- 80%
- development
- 0%
- narrative
- 60%
- risk
- 80%
- overall
- 70%
Data confidence is separate from the opportunity coverage gate.
On-chain
- Recent volume is below the 24h pace.
- 24h volume changed -34% versus the prior stored snapshot.
- Liquidity changed -1% versus the prior stored snapshot.
- Holder count changed 1% versus the prior stored snapshot.
Smart money
- Signal
- Not available
- Qualified wallets
- 0
- High-confidence wallets
- 0
- Independent entities
- 0
- Independence
- Not available
- Accumulating
- 0
- Historical early-entry quality
- Not available
- Entry range fit
- Not available
- Coordination risk
- Not available
- Data confidence
- Not available
Why smart money matters
6 holder wallets were observed from this run. None have a measured historical track record, so none are qualified. A large balance is not smart money.
Smart money is evidence. It does not clear a honeypot, a malicious contract, extreme concentration, thin liquidity, or unsafe tokenomics.
Historical smart-money evidence: Not available. No free chart has been stored for this token yet.
Wallet tracking
- Tracked since
- 2026-09-27 00:36:07.185348+00:00
- Candidates
- 102
- Emerging
- 1
- Qualified
- 0
- High-confidence
- 0
- Independent entities
- 103
- Coordination risk
- LOW
Tracking starts when a wallet is seen buying a watch, discovery, or strong research token. A candidate is not smart money.
Development
Not available. A missing GitHub link is not treated as proof that nobody is building.
Narrative
- Narrative label FLAT_24H. Median sourced category market-cap change is -0.5% over 24h.
- A single 24h category move is not labeled HIGH and is not a multi-signal narrative score.
- The token name was not used to invent a category.
Tokenomics
- FDV is 1.0x circulating market cap.
Risk
- LP lock status is unknown. Unknown is not treated as locked.
Catalysts
- Sustained volume improvement over multiple observations rather than a single strong hourly reading.
- Positive holder growth accompanied by stable or rising liquidity.
- Verification of meaningful utility, active development, transparent ownership, and credible token distribution.
- Improved market depth, broader reliable trading access, or independently verified project milestones.
Historical analogues
Not available. Analogues require stored candidates at least 30 days older, with enough overlapping features.
10x / 100x / 1000x market-cap scenarios
- 10x market cap
- $331.87M
- 100x market cap
- $3.32B
- 1000x market cap
- $33.19B
These are arithmetic market-cap scenarios, not predictions and not probabilities.
- No historical sector maximum is stored in the local corpus, so precedent is not available. Absence of a stored precedent is not evidence against the scenario.
- No historical sector maximum is stored in the local corpus, so precedent is not available. Absence of a stored precedent is not evidence against the scenario.
- No historical sector maximum is stored in the local corpus, so precedent is not available. Absence of a stored precedent is not evidence against the scenario.
AI research rationale
WKC is a potentially interesting discovery candidate, but the evidence supports watchlist status rather than a high-conviction investment thesis. The token has substantial observed trading age, approximately $1.11 million in liquidity, and no material automated risk flag on available inputs. However, recent 24-hour volume declined 57%, holder count was flat, narrative momentum was labeled FLAT_24H, and key fundamentals, ownership concentration details, and smart-money data are unavailable.
Confidence: medium. The packet contains several consistent market-structure and survival inputs, including liquidity, observed age, and recent activity changes. Confidence remains limited because the evidence lacks contract-control analysis, ownership concentration, fundamentals, project verification, smart-money data, and specific historical analogues.
Why it is interesting
The opportunity score is 63.1 and observed trading age is 1664.1 days, which may indicate persistence relative to newer tokens. Liquidity is approximately $1.11 million and FDV is approximately equal to circulating market capitalization, so the available data does not show a large FDV-to-market-cap discrepancy. These are screening positives, not proof of quality or future performance.
Bull case
WKC could represent a relatively established BSC token with durable market access: observed trading age is long, liquidity is above $1 million, the honeypot check was negative on the sources that ran, and the survival heuristic scored 83.0. If volume recovery becomes sustained and is accompanied by holder growth and stable or increasing liquidity, the token's discovery status could strengthen.
Bear case
The thesis may be overstated by relying on survival and liquidity metrics without evidence of utility, revenue, development activity, distribution quality, or credible demand. Recent 24-hour volume fell 57% versus the prior snapshot, holder count was unchanged, narrative momentum was flat, and the 2.1x last-hour volume pace may be too short-lived to establish a trend. The reported age is only the earliest observed pool age, not a verified genesis date.
What would invalidate it
The constructive screening thesis would be weakened or invalidated by evidence of materially concentrated or insider-controlled ownership, adverse contract permissions, unreliable liquidity, inability to exit, fabricated or misleading age data, sustained volume deterioration, falling liquidity, or discovery of no meaningful project activity or utility. A negative honeypot result alone would not prevent these conclusions.
Missing information
- Verified token supply, holder count, wallet concentration, and top-holder changes.
- Contract ownership status, mint or blacklist permissions, upgradeability, taxes, and other admin controls.
- Trading-pair composition, liquidity-lock or liquidity-provider ownership details, and depth or slippage data.
- Project documentation, utility, roadmap, development activity, team identity, treasury, and revenue or usage metrics.
- Exchange coverage, organic user activity, recurring volume quality, and wash-trading analysis.
- Smart-money or sophisticated-holder data; the packet states that this is unavailable.
- Historical analogue records and stored later market-cap outcomes; no specific analogue evidence is supplied.
- Independent verification of the earliest pool date and whether the observed pool represents the token's actual launch.
Model gpt-5.6-luna. The model did not choose the scores.
Backtest context
Forward returns at 7, 30, 90, 180, and 365 days are recorded after those horizons elapse. Until the sample is large enough, no signal is described as predictive.
Source links